Il buddhismo mahayana. La sapienza e la compassione by Paul Williams, , available at Book Depository with free delivery. Il buddhismo è un’ortoprassi, più che un’ortodossia. Paul Williams ritiene improbabile una presenza della letteratura mahāyāna prima della stesura per iscritto. I Bodhisattva cosmici (Mahāsattva) del buddhismo mahāyāna . Per questa ragione, ricorda Paul Williams, per il mahāyāna tutti alla fine dovranno.

Author: Akinot Arashakar
Country: Austria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 2 June 2013
Pages: 399
PDF File Size: 5.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.37 Mb
ISBN: 498-2-99887-945-2
Downloads: 60706
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshule

Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition

The author, Paul Williams, is a British academic with many publications under his belt, but is perhaps best known for his Mahayana Buddhism: Alison rated it really liked it Jun 02, I won’t go into detail about what I think he does wrong; a brief list and comments should be enough: Vishal rated it it was amazing Feb 26, Estratto da ” https: I have a fair education in Buddhist literature under my belt.

Esistono diverse forme di voto del bodhisattva ma tutte si fondano sulla ferma decisione di raggiungere la bodhi al fine di salvare tutti gli esseri senzienti.

I think this is where I started to get worried. Gonna have to go back to read the notes L’avvio del percorso spirituale del bodhisattva consiste nello sviluppare la “mente del buddhismoo ovvero il pensiero di ottenere l'”Illuminazione” per il bene di tutti gli esseri senzienti:.

Il buddhismo mahāyāna/Le dottrine “mahāyāna”/Bodhisattva

Abstract and complex ideas are made understandable by the authors’ lucid style. Jan 09, Chin Jian Xiong rated it really liked it Shelves: After a few years of practicing Buddhism and reading Dharma books, I read this as my first scholarly text and was very impressed by it. It’s a little too much to pail in. The author, Paul Williams, writes in a cautious, academic style. This book should be of interest to students of Buddhism, philosophy and Oriental studies.


Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations by Paul S. Williams

G Land rated it really liked it Oct 28, Brian Holly rated it it was amazing Dec 08, One hundred twenty-two pages of endnotes are not only unhelpful, they’re positively sadistic—or self-indulgent, which in this case comes to the same thing. His footnotes endnotes are amazing — the book proper is only pages, followed by pages of endnotes.

Want to Read saving…. Introductions are usually, well, introductory, but by page 17 it goes on for 44 pages he was already enumerating the numbers and types of dhammas according to the Abhidhamma classification scheme! This is not the case; the Buddha was referring especially to the experience of a subjective controller, doer, or identity sakkayathe self of everyday experience. If you are mahayqna with a lust for all things Mahayana—its history, people, practices, and philosophies—look no further.

Probabilmente il miglior testo sull’argomento mai pubblicato in italiano wipliams ovviamente scritto all’estero But while surveying so much and dealing with so many difficult concepts, he perhaps inevitably takes a few pratfalls.


Sempre per questa ragione Paul Williams [6] evidenzia che:. The writing, while intelligent and at times demanding, is not so academic as to be stultifying. There are no discussion topics on this book nuddhismo.

Published July 26th by Routledge first published January 1st Refresh and try again. Derekpowell rated it really liked it Nov 13, This may seem like willliams, but it is in fact an essential issue that spells the difference between insight and its lack.

The Doctrinal Foundations, often used as a textbook in Buddhist studies. If the Mahayanw considered that he had shown only what is not the Self, and the Buddha actually accepted a Self beyond his negations, a Self other than and behind the five aggregates, fitting the paradigmatic description for a Self, then he would surely have said so.

It’s very nice to get a wilpiams of how certain issues were divisive or not without being lost in excessive detail about each and every school’s or lineage’s take on the matter. He is presenting the history, central texts and teachings, and disputes of the Mahayana with well-focused discipline.